Home Failure and Reform

Failure and Reform

Clean Break in Modern Divorce Versus Separation in the Past

Clean Break in Modern Divorce Versus Separation in the Past
A modern divorce agreement may specify child support amounts as well as the division of property.

These things are still common financial issues to deal with in a divorce.

However, many people who divorce, especially those without children, expect to make a clean break when their marriage is done.

A lot of individuals feel that as long as a spouse is capable of working, the divorce agreement should not include any alimony payments.Many times, the courts will agree to this thought.

Modern divorcees are not awarded alimony payments in their divorce agreements as much as those in the past.

If they are awarded alimony payments, then they are more likely to be temporary, as a way of helping to get the dependent spouse back on their feet before the clean break is created.

What Are The General Reasons Alimony

What Are The General Reasons Alimony

Alimony reform organizations have sprung up in the last decade to argue against current alimony policies that dictate divorce settlements.

Alimony reform groups have several arguments for changing the alimony guidelines that exist today.

Arguments by those who pay alimony are based on the long-term financial strain inflicted on them.

Their request for alimony reform argues that paying permanent alimony to someone they are no longer legally bound or involved with, is unfair.

Alimony reform activists say that the permanent payments affect not only themselves but any future spouses or partners, as well as other family members.

While there are several circumstances that spouses can use to seek alimony modification after divorce settlements, remarriage by the payer is not usually one of them.

Permanent alimony is only awarded if a couple’s circumstances meet certain qualifications.

With this in mind, recipients of alimony in a divorce settlement argue that it is not fair for them to have to be thrown back into the workforce and expect to be financially comfortable, especially if they previously stayed at home to raise the couple’s children.

Alimony reform organizations especially have a problem with Massachusetts state alimony rules, which are considered to be very unfair to an alimony payer’s next spouse.

It is also argued that although alimony laws are not supposed to consider gender a factor when awarding alimony, women are favored in divorce settlements.

Many people believe individuals both for and against alimony reform have valid points when it comes to debating alimony policies. However, right now the policies remain unchanged

What Are The Implications of Life Time Support

What Are The Implications of Life Time Support
When an individual is facing permanent alimony marriage While these guidelines seem fair to some people, others argue that it harms both spouses.

Critics claim that being the recipient of alimony takes working toward financial independence off of the recipient’s priority list, even if they could take steps to do so.

Those seeking to ban permanent alimony argue that a spouse who is awarded permanent alimony in their divorce proceedings will be less likely to try to improve their financial status, and may pass up opportunities that they should take in order to improve their lives.

The activists believe that rehabilitative alimony has a much better chance of helping dependent spouses achieve success by allowing them payments for a set period of time as they work towards financial independence.

Those who have to pay permanent alimony will also be harmed, supporters of a ban on permanent alimony payments argue. Paying permanent alimony can cause an individual to suffer major financial strain, especially if that individual remarries or has more children.

There are reasons that one may win a petition to modify alimony. However, usually, factors involving the paying spouse’s remarriage are not considered to be a valid reason to be granted permission to reduce permanent alimony payments.

Massachusetts Alimony Reform Explained

Massachusetts Alimony Reform Explained

While permanent alimony Complaints about Massachusetts alimony laws are similar to the complaints against alimony laws in other states.

Protesters say that permanent alimony is unfair to both spouses, as it encourages constant interdependence by the recipient of the alimony, while financially hurting the ex-spouse paying.

Protesters are not fighting every Massachusetts law on alimony, such as allowing permanent payments to those who are mentally or physically ill, disabled, or suffer from another serious condition.

While the desire to change many permanent alimony laws is strong, the alimony law that has protesters fighting especially hard is unique to Massachusetts.

Usually, the amount of each alimony payment is calculated by examining the needs of the ex-spouse and the income of the paying spouse. In Massachusetts, if the spouse paying alimony remarries, the court has a right to award additional alimony to the recipient by calculating the second spouse’s income and assets.

Usually, the spouse paying alimony is the husband. This means that the second wife can be held responsible for contributing her own money to her husband’s ex-spouse. If the couple does not pay, alimony laws dictate that they can be incarcerated.

It is important to remember that like most alimony laws, this one is not always definite. However, it is very possible for a second spouse to be forced to help support the first spouse by contributing alimony.

If the alimony recipient requests an increase in alimony due to the fact that the assets of the ex-spouse have increased, it is very possible for the court to determine the assets and financial standing of the second spouse, and raise the alimony payment accordingly.

This Massachusetts alimony law also may require the second spouse to pay all the first spouse’s alimony, if the spouse responsible for paying their ex’s alimony gets sick, loses their job, or faces another type of financial crisis.

Not surprisingly, this alimony law outrages many second spouses, mostly wives, who may suddenly find themselves responsible for helping to support their spouse’s first partner.

No other state in America has alimony laws that allow a second spouse’s income to be taken into account when determining alimony payments. Protesters of this alimony law are trying to get it repealed.

Unpredictability of Alimony

Unpredictability of Alimony
Sometimes, the outcome of divorce proceedings surprises the individuals requesting alimony and child support.

The only law that is nationwide is that the court must not consider gender at all when awarding alimony and child support.

With no firm laws in place, divorce agreements and case outcomes can differ drastically, leading to some unfair decisions.

The outcome of divorce agreements involving alimony requests is left up to the judge in family court, unless the couple agrees on the alimony and child support arrangements personally.

If set laws were put into effect, an individual would know what will entitle them to alimony payments and what will not.